| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] |
141. [Odyssey] Ship Resistance Bonuses - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP Fozzie wrote: Converting the resist bonuses to HP buffer bonuses would be much easier to balance as it affects a smaller set of mechanics, but that also removes what I think are a very iconic set of bonuses. When I look at all the negati...
- by Gosti Kahanid - at 2013.04.16 12:06:00
|
142. Sticky:[Retribution Point Release] Combat Battlecruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Fabio Khanid-El wrote: I don't see how the Harbinger rebalancing was a buff... I deal less dps now and have less armor with my harb. I might just throw it in the trash bin now. When you have less DPS than bevore the patch, then you must have...
- by Gosti Kahanid - at 2013.02.27 22:44:00
|
143. [Idea] Suicide AOE Self Destruct Module (Now with 35% more consequences!) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I like the idea. Make the strengh of the explosion depend on the Reactor and the Cap of the Ship, so the bigger the Ship (or the bigger the reactor), the more damage you do. When you-¦re going down, then why not take the others with you^^ (they s...
- by Gosti Kahanid - at 2013.02.26 19:40:00
|
144. Future of Armagedon - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
With the 3 Amarr-BC, you also have 3 different Roles with them. The Abaddon is clearly a Comat-Ship with its Damage and Tank-Bonus. The Armageddon is a Attack-Ship with more DPS than the Abaddon. The Apocalypse is a SniperShip with its Range-Bon...
- by Gosti Kahanid - at 2013.02.25 09:53:00
|
145. Sticky:Dev blog: The great ship skill change of summer 2013 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Rannxz Janau wrote: If I have the Providence trained and this expansion goes through, will I get Advanced Spaceship Command V given to me? I only have Level I trained on it so far, but I see that once the patch goes through it will require Leve...
- by Gosti Kahanid - at 2013.02.25 09:39:00
|
146. Sticky:Dev blog: You have insulted my honor - I demand satisfaction! Dueling com... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Quoting this for the fifth time in this threat... CCP Masterplan wrote: Because a lot of people are asking (and it wasn't nailed down at the time of writing this blog) there will be a "Reject all duel challenges" option per character. This w...
- by Gosti Kahanid - at 2013.02.18 10:28:00
|
147. The AAR is quite aweful - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
The ASB is like a combination of a CapBooster and a ShieldBooster. If it runs out of Charges, it loses the Effekt of one Module, in this Case the CapBooster, and needs Energy, even more than a normal ShieldBooster The AAR is like a combination of ...
- by Gosti Kahanid - at 2013.02.14 11:24:00
|
148. How should we improve the inventory UI? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Jamus Duran wrote: ISSUE: While searching through the market browser, you find something you might like to buy and then think to yourself 'Hey, I wonder if I already have one somewhere?.' So, you go to assets, type in the item you want to loo...
- by Gosti Kahanid - at 2013.02.07 13:23:00
|
149. Sticky:[Retribution Point Release] Combat Battlecruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Abaut the Drake Damage-Bonus: Why not change the "10% to Kinetic Damage" to "5% to Damage, and additional 5% to Kinetik" Such a Bonus existet once for a Amarr-Frig, why not make it for the Drake. Like this, Kinetic ist still the superior Damage-Ty...
- by Gosti Kahanid - at 2013.02.06 21:27:00
|
150. Sticky:[Retribution Point Release] Combat Battlecruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
serras bang wrote: Pinky Denmark wrote: You're missing the point - T2 armor reps are usually better than Meta 4 with higher fittings in return. Anyway active tanking still has huge issues keeping up with the damage from even a single battlec...
- by Gosti Kahanid - at 2013.02.04 01:34:00
|
151. Sticky:[Retribution Point Release] Combat Battlecruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
To mare wrote: Gosti Kahanid wrote: or give it a 10% Bonus to kinetic and 5% to the other Types. With this kinetic ist still the strongest, but it closes the gab betwenn the others An Amarr-Frig once hat a Bonus-split like this, only with EM...
- by Gosti Kahanid - at 2013.01.28 14:13:00
|
152. Sticky:[Retribution Point Release] Combat Battlecruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
or give it a 10% Bonus to kinetic and 5% to the other Types. With this kinetic ist still the strongest, but it closes the gab betwenn the others An Amarr-Frig once hat a Bonus-split like this, only with EM on the strongest Site.
- by Gosti Kahanid - at 2013.01.28 12:11:00
|
153. Ideas for new modules - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Defender-Missile-Launcher. Doesn-¦t need a Launcher-Hardpoint, so you can fit it in a Utility-High and can only use Defender-Missiles. When activates, stays at standby until a hostile missile is in its range and then starts a Defender. This yould...
- by Gosti Kahanid - at 2013.01.28 09:21:00
|
154. [Retribution 1.1] Armor Tanking 2.0 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
The biggest Problem ist that both, active- and buffer-tank, benefit from a resist-bonus. How about the Idea to change resist-bonuses to a bonus to HP for Armor and Armor-plates (same with Shild and extenders). With this, the EHP would stay the sa...
- by Gosti Kahanid - at 2013.01.25 09:49:00
|
155. Sticky:[Retribution Point Release] Combat Battlecruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I can remember a Amarr-Rocket-Frig with a "5% damage to EM Rockets and Light Missiles and 2,5% to other Damage-Types" Why not do the same with the Drake? Instead of the "10% to kinetic" make "10% to kinetic and 5% to other Damage-Types" with this ...
- by Gosti Kahanid - at 2013.01.25 09:44:00
|
156. Sticky:EVE Online: Retribution 1.0 Feedback - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Axloth Okiah wrote: Gosti Kahanid wrote: With the new changes a HIC can no longer aktivate a bubble directly after deaktivating a Cloak. This is a very good Idea, but I noticed, that this is not the case with a Interdictor. Is this going to ...
- by Gosti Kahanid - at 2012.12.07 14:54:00
|
157. Sticky:EVE Online: Retribution 1.0 Feedback - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
With the new changes a HIC can no longer aktivate a bubble directly after deaktivating a Cloak. This is a very good Idea, but I noticed, that this is not the case with a Interdictor. Is this going to be changed to, and how about Cynos? I think it ...
- by Gosti Kahanid - at 2012.12.07 12:01:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |